This is exactly the kind of program we should have used to catch Al Qaeda and bin Laden. too bad Bush and Cheney wanted to turn the whole Middle East into an inferno.
I should clarify, my program would have been out in the open, not secret, the better to psychologically get under the skin of Al Qaeda. These organizations always need new members(especially with suicide bombers)and to let Al Qaeda know we would try to infiltrate would make it harder and use more security energy to enlist new members.
I wonder how they plan to get around the memos that the top dems at the minimum knew all about the program? I think we have one little lady from SF who hopes this all will just go away. And as of yet, they still cannot define terrorism. Its like trying to define a personal foul in the NBA. A waste of time and money.
Lakers are the favorite with the celtics the possible successor. Shaq will never hold up in a full season.
The obvious thing about the referees. A foul to one is not a foul to another. We can't have such standards placed on our great men and woman who protect us. Is the new standard attempting to criminalize every president proceeding the new? Maybe our next president can prosecute Obama for rape of the constitution not to mention appointing Czars without approval of congress.
8 comments:
This is exactly the kind of program we should have used to catch Al Qaeda and bin Laden. too bad Bush and Cheney wanted to turn the whole Middle East into an inferno.
I should clarify, my program would have been out in the open, not secret, the better to psychologically get under the skin of Al Qaeda. These organizations always need new members(especially with suicide bombers)and to let Al Qaeda know we would try to infiltrate would make it harder and use more security energy to enlist new members.
I wonder how they plan to get around the memos that the top dems at the minimum knew all about the program? I think we have one little lady from SF who hopes this all will just go away. And as of yet, they still cannot define terrorism. Its like trying to define a personal foul in the NBA. A waste of time and money.
Yet they still call personal fouls in the NBA - and punish those who commit them.
They call them if they aren't on the take(says a Suns fan).
Sounds like a Suns fan holding a grudge! Next year the Cavs should have it with Shaq supporting LeBron. Anybody but the Lakers, please!
Lakers are the favorite with the celtics the possible successor. Shaq will never hold up in a full season.
The obvious thing about the referees. A foul to one is not a foul to another. We can't have such standards placed on our great men and woman who protect us. Is the new standard attempting to criminalize every president proceeding the new? Maybe our next president can prosecute Obama for rape of the constitution not to mention appointing Czars without approval of congress.
Yes, anony, those 2 things are equivalent to torture he says with his teeth clenched and his eyes rolling back in his head
Post a Comment